edit-article
Home
Up
Delete
Article Name:
Article Description:
[41:00] VIDEO by the cbc.ca fifth estate program -
Chapter ID/Name:
Status:
Write
Writing
Written
Add Photo:
Owner ID:
Content:
use HTML
Edit Content
<h1 style="text-align: center;">The Secrets of Sugar</h1> <h2>[WHAT]</h2> <ol> <li>] by __ @ _- [41:00] VIDEO by the cbc.ca fifth estate program - TV documentary that summarizes the story of how initially we(the USA) thought FAT was the evil villain that was killing innocent americans in droves, now we are re-thinking that theory and hypothesizing that SUGAR could be the devil after all. After ignoring the early warnings of scientist __ in the 1950's and then finding that another scientist, Robert Lustig in the 2000's was coming out with the same conclusions.</li> </ol> <h2>[WHY]</h2> <ol> <li>] </li> </ol> <h2>[WHERE]</h2> <ol> <li><strong>[41:00] WATCH THE FULL VIDEO</strong></li> <ol> <li>] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3ksKkCOgTw" target="_blank">The secrets of Sugar</a> 323,323 views*</li> </ol></ol> <h2>[WHEN]</h2> <ol> <li>] 2016-08-01</li> <li>] 2014-10-04 ( originally published )</li> </ol> <h2>[EXAMPLE]</h2> <ol> <li>] We’ve heard for years about the dangers of eating too much fat or salt. But there have never been recommended limits for sugar on Canadian food labels, despite emerging research that suggests the sweet stuff may be making more of us fat and sick. In the fifth estate’s season premiere, Gillian Findlay digs into the surprising science — and the reaction from the food industry — to reveal The Secrets of Sugar. Has the sugar industry been hiding an unsavoury truth from consumers?</li> <li>] A small but influential group of medical researchers is stirring up the health debate, linking sugar not just to rising obesity rates but also to a host of diseases including cancer, heart disease and Alzheimer’s.</li> <li>] We put a family of four on a healthy diet to try to beat their sugar habit and track the surprising results. We talk to leading scientists – and their critics. And we ask the food industry why those ingredient labels are far from clear when it comes to how much sugar is really on your plate.</li> </ol> <h2>[HOW-TO]</h2> <ol> <li>]</li> </ol> <h2>[REFERENCE]</h2> <ol> <li>*] another video title BEST-DOCUMENTARY uploaded by u/ , also has ## views, it is the same video</li> </ol> <p> </p> <hr /> <h1 style="text-align: center;">VIDEO SUMMARY</h1> <p><strong><br /></strong></p> <ol> <li><strong>[00:00]</strong> FAMILY {Bretons}, tries to "eat healthy" BUT food/meal choices have to be ] fast, and they also have to ] keep the kids happy</li> <li>] nutritionist "explains" their diet choices, uses example of a cereal serving size for Dad which is 8x the 3/4 cup "suggested serving" size that the nutrition panel on the box provides details for, instead of 1x. This would be about 20 teaspoons(te) of added suger (@ 10g per serving * 8) in a single "DAD" bowl of cereal ( BEFORE milk)</li> <li><strong>[00:00] sugar</strong></li> <li>] sugar goes by a lot of names/form factors, ] sugar, ] honey, ] molasses, ] glucose, ] fructose, ] corn syrup, ] high fructose corn syrup, ] ....</li> <li>] chemically it is all - pretty much the same stuff</li> <li>] the average consumption (in North America) is currently 26 te per person, per day, that adds up to 40kg per year</li> <li><strong>[00:00] processed foods industry</strong></li> <li>] sugar sweetens products and spikes the profits of some of the worlds most powerful companies,</li> <li>] the processed food industry, with close to 1T in annual sales, couldn't do it without sugar,</li> <li><strong>[00:00] Bruce Bradley - former food industry executive (company, company)</strong></li> <li>] sugar is one of the basic building blocks in 99% of processed foods</li> <li>] the food industry have figured out what makes us CRAVE a product, the bliss point, the level where you like the product the most</li> <li>] companies keep ADDing "sugar" to their products until you surpass the bliss point ,</li> <li>] lots of sugar is HIDDEN, vanilla yogurt, bread, soups like campbells tomato soup (14 g in 1/2 cup serving) , healthy choice chicken dinner</li> <li>] going back 50 years, increased sugar consumption tracks increased obesity levels, increased type 2 diabetes levels, ....</li> <li>] these problems used to be attributed to DIETary fat,</li> <li><strong>[00:00] Robert Lustig, MD </strong></li> <li>] sugar is 1000* worse than fat,</li> <li>] effects of what too much sugar does to our bodies</li> <li>] glucose/fructose problems begin in liver, liver fat causes metabolic diseases</li> <li><strong>[11:00]</strong> - for FAMILY dad, a weeks worth of sugar consumption totals 245 teaspoons, half a coffee pot full of sugar</li> <li>- FAMILY is tossing out products with sugar</li> <li><strong>[13:00]</strong> - PLAN is for 3 weeks, cbc is providing all meals, professionally made, without any suger, will submit to test</li> <li>- started with Blood Tests - Dr says they dont look good, unless changes are made, heading down a bad path</li> <li>- food industy has known links between processed foods and disease for a long tim</li> <li>- meetings between companies like ( ..., kraft, coca-cola, general mills, ...) started as early as , to talk about obesity</li> <li>- company exec and nutrionalists (michael mod) discussed the EFFECTS of sugar on the body</li> <li>] hoping for money for more studies, got reprimand from food co execs, "we already offer "healthy" products", our responsiblity is to wall we dont want to know</li> <li><strong>[18:00]</strong> food industry has proven successful at shutting down "dissenting voices"</li> <li>] interview - john yudkin - author of "", , yudkins research and reputation were destroyed by ....</li> <li>] ansel keys, american nutrionist, helped destroy yudkins reputation for his sugar assertions, later keyes was discovered to have been funded by corporate america , set the standard for anyone who did research on sugar. If you study sugar, you are like the quack - yudkin</li> <li><strong>] science - feeding healthy students a diet of too much sugar </strong></li> <li>] FAMILY dad - blood test results suggest he is on verge of becoming a diabetic (type 2)</li> <li>] lusting - sugar is the cause of diabetes - research what about the food supply p</li> <li>] john sevenpiper, toronto research says lustig research is flawed. ex = link could be between bottled water and obesity, can test for markers</li> <li><strong>[22:00]</strong> uni cal davis - testing "healthy students" - fed sugar(drink that contained 25% daily calories as hf corn syrupt) to see if raises the markers for heart disease</li> <li>] consistent results, - ] increases in visceral adiposity(abdominal fat), associated with increased risk of diabetes, heart disease</li> <li>] u cal researchers shocked by how quickly problems surfaced, within 2 weeks</li> <li>] seevenpiper - denies this research also, says as long as you match for calories, fructose doesnt behave any differently than other form of carbohydrate calories ( starches, glucose)</li> <li>] u cal says - they have tested with other additives as well, didnt see the same results, only "fructose" caused the problems. say if this was a new additive, it would get pulled pretty quickly</li> <li><strong>[26:00]</strong> top cancer researcher Louis Cantly, Cornell university - was chosen to head a "super team" of cancer research to accelerate finding a cure, when asked about sugar, " do you believe that sugar consumption causes cancer?" says YES, i do believe "that eating too much sugar can increase the probabilty of cancer and can make the outcome of people who already have cancer, worse.</li> <li><strong>[26:40] how sugar works in your body</strong> - sugar is 2 molecules( 1 glucose + 1 fructose), we know that too much fructose in the liver sets of a chain reaction, it causes the liver to produce more insulin</li> <li>] cantly believes excess insulin changes cancer tumors, the insulin tells them to gobble up more insulin, some cancers(those that correlate with obesity, diabetes) , tumors use glucose as a fuel to grow</li> <li>] can it cause cancer to start - cantly " I certainly avoid sugar when i can"</li> <li><strong>[28:00] Brown University - Rhode Island - Rat Study - </strong>rats fed a diet typical of north american dietary content get brain damage, act "demented", dont remember their learnings, fail just like humans with alzheimers, believes that alzheimers may be like a diabetes of the human brain</li> <li>] this research is NOT scientific mainstream - currently - there is no mainstream scientific evidence villifying sugar, although</li> <li>] AmericanHeartAssocian - now RECOMMENDS - reduction of "added sugars" - 6 teaspoons max for women, 9 for men</li> <li><strong>[30:00]</strong> Canadian food industy - unimpressed - "ATPIT the science isnt there to support a role in chronic disease"</li> <li>] gov ads - 1 soda a day == 50# of sugar in a year -- 4 g per teaspoon, 1 12 oz coke has 39 grams( approx 10 teaspoons) of sugar * 365 = 14600g/ 454 = 32 #</li> <li>] big sugar - consumerfreedom.com - fights back - dont take away MY ice cream, dont</li> <li><strong>[32:00] Bankrupt sugar company documents reveal -</strong></li> <li>] christina cousins ( community dentist ) - confidential memo from sugar assoc (1970s) - newly published whitepaper says sugar was important in the diet, paper funded by sugar industry</li> <li>] sugar talk in montreal in 1971 - concerned with heart disease </li> <li>] pursuing research at __ under tutelage of ( tobacco</li> <li>] lots of paralells between sugar/tobacco - ] trying to undermine sciences, ] trying to subvert sensible regulation, ]</li> <li>] who wanted recommendations -</li> <li>] sugar industry, went to friends in congress</li> <li>] have to get big corporation under control</li> <li>] bruce bradley - former corporte</li> <li>] completely wrong trajectory with health</li> <li><strong>[37:00] advocates keep trying</strong></li> <li>] recommended limits</li> <li>] sugar industry</li> <li>] IF your getting sick from what you eat, its your fault</li> <li>] to blame the victim</li> <li>] by 2026, there will be no money left - IF - we do nothing</li> <li><strong>[40:00] FAMILY - BRETONS - results of 3 weeks of lower sugar fooods</strong></li> <li>] still eating the same kinds of food that they like, eating as much as they like</li> <li>] DIFFERENCE foods are not procesed, no added sugars</li> <li>] MAN - lost inches on waist, lost #s</li> <li>] WOMAN - lost inches on waist, lost #s</li> <li>] MAN blood tests - cholesterol down, tryglycerides down</li> <li>] WOMAN blood test -</li> <li>] test is far from scientific, BUT results are significant</li> </ol> <h1 style="text-align: center;"> </h1>