(public).sospep.subjects ~ view article ~ the-selection-process

<h1 style="text-align: center;">the A list</h1>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">our selection process and how it makes this a better 'best-of' list</h1>
<h2>[WHAT]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] heres where things can/start to get a little 'messy',&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>] how are we going to choose 'the winners' from the "list of nominees"</li>
</ol>
<li>] lets begin by starting with the easy parts, we can use some baseline statistics like ....&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>] total # nominations,&nbsp;</li>
<li>] total nomination plus count,&nbsp;</li>
<li>] references,&nbsp;</li>
<li>] user follower count (to determine subcategory ranking),&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] and use those numbers to create a&nbsp;'baseline score'</li>
<ol>
<li>] this will seperate the people who "many people" are nominating versus those who have "few people" nominating them,&nbsp;</li>
<li>] although it wont necessarily harm/penalize the people with fewer nominations,&nbsp;</li>
<li>] but is geared more towards seperating those with large follower bases and multiple nominations versus those with small follower bases and multiple nominations</li>
<ol>
<li>(for EX someone with 10 nominations and 100K followers would score higher than someone with 10 nominations and 500k followers.)</li>
</ol>
<li>] people with single nominations would have to be judges solely on their 'content quality' score</li>
</ol>
<li>] the harder part is when things start to get 'subjective', creating a 'content quality score' beginning with&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>] profile - review</li>
<ol>
<li>] profile exists - the 'nominee' is present on the network,&nbsp;</li>
<li>] profile quality - a 'bluehead' with no info in the 'about' section should likely be disqualified</li>
<li>] has activity - someone who hasn't posted in the last (x) months, isn't likely to be 1 of the best &nbsp;&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] review - post content quality - related to their nominated subject category area/circle/</li>
<ol>
<li>] PROBLEM = who/what defines/determines what quality content is&nbsp;</li>
<li>] SOLUTION = you do</li>
<li>] PROBLEM = how do 'we' rank what you like?&nbsp;</li>
<li>] SOLUTION = you vote&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] review - 'content created' VS 'content curated'</li>
<ol>
<li>] ratio -&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] review - level of engagement&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>] are they engaging? - is the person posting the 'content' replying to commentors,</li>
<li>] what is the level/frequency of engagement - frequently, infrequently, not at all&nbsp;</li>
<li>] are they censoring?&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] total - score</li>
<ol>
<li>] baseline score</li>
<li>] content quality score&nbsp;</li>
</ol></ol>
<li>] REMOVED TO: Category =&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>] as I worked through the list of nominations from Amanda's post, to pick out&nbsp;my winners, here's what i discovered about "the people" who got nominated,&nbsp;</li>
<li>] they got nominated a lot, and 1 commentors comment that really rang true,&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>"g+ is full of a whole lot of people talking about g+"&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] i have put a lot of 'those people' into their own category called&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>] business-of- social-media</li>
</ol>
<li>] VERY IMPORTANT NOTE!</li>
<ol>
<li>] this in NOT a bash on the network or on any of the people in these categories. IF this is the type of information/content that you are looking for/interested this group of people is a GOLD MINE in these Removed To: Categories contain "the A listers", in relation to their subject category&nbsp;</li>
</ol></ol>
<li>] REMOVED TO: CATEGORIE(S)</li>
<ol>
<li>] Not to pick on the social-media gurus only, there are several other 'subject categories' which i have identified that seem to have large fan followings/mass appeal and you can review them all in the &nbsp;list below. We are taking these people out&nbsp;</li>
</ol></ol>
<h2>[WHY]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] WHY THIS LIST IS DIFFERENT (and hopefully Better than) "the others"</li>
<ol>
<li>] The g+'ers who have been REMOVED TO CATEGORIES (listed below) include most?all of the most popular, well established people whom you will find on most&nbsp;other best of lists.&nbsp;</li>
<li>] These categories lists ALSO contain people who have been nominated in these same subject categories but have not yet amassed the giant follower bases, we could call them the up and comers of g+, hopefully worth your time for taking a look at.</li>
</ol>
<li>]&nbsp;WHAT MAKES THIS LIST BETTER -&nbsp;ADDED CATEGORIES:</li>
<ol>
<li>] see list below -&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] AND WHAT MAKES THIS LIST BETTER</li>
<ol>
<li>] you can vote -&nbsp;</li>
<li>] you can nominate -&nbsp;</li>
<li>] you can add categories -&nbsp;</li>
<li>] and if your a sospep member, you can also ....</li>
</ol>
<li>]&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<h2>[WHERE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] REVISION - RE MOVING some big names from my A list&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;<a href="/view/people?id=59" target="_blank">business-of-social-media</a>&nbsp;-&nbsp;</li>
<ol>
<li>] if you are getting started with using&nbsp;g+ for personal&nbsp;or professional use, if you want to&nbsp;use g+ to build your business, if you want to&nbsp;learn how to create good g+ content, or how to&nbsp;promote your content, to&nbsp;grow your network, etc, etc This is where &nbsp;you will&nbsp;find the best people, pages and communities to do that</li>
<li>] includes the likes of Martin Shervington, Denis Labelle, Mark Traphagen, Dustin W. Stout, David Amerland,&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>]&nbsp;the-multi-millionaires-club</li>
<ol>
<li>] these are the&nbsp;rock stars of g+&nbsp;that have amassed massive followings on this network, they have done so because they post good content, they engage with their audiences, they are connected and they know how to play the social media game. I have included the main 'category' that their posts would fall into but for many they post across a wide variety of topics.</li>
<li>] includes the likes of [technology] Guy Kawasaki, Mike Elgan, Robert Scoble, [business-social-meda] Vic Gundotra, Bradley Horowitz, [business]( Larry Page, Sergey Brin) [photographers] trey ratcliffe, thomas hawk</li>
</ol>
<li>]&nbsp;<a href="/view/people?id=77" target="_blank">the-art-of-photography</a></li>
<ol>
<li>] a picture is worth a # of words and these people know how to take them and many are very willing to share not only their photos, but how they created them and how you to can create better photos</li>
<li>] includes the likes of Trey Ratcliff, Thomas Hawk, Christa Rae,&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] the-media-machine</li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;mainstream,&nbsp;technology, &nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of the verge, techcrunch, WSJ, UsaToday, ESPN&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] the-technology-titans</li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of,&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] the-FandRoids</li>
<ol>
<li>] if you are a fan of the android operating system and the devices that run it, congratulations you have reached the holy grail. The g+ network is filled wth like minded people talking about everything you ever wanted to know about android and even some stuff you didnt want to know.&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of JR Raphael, Phil Nickinson,&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] the-brands</li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of nascar, tesla,&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] celebrity</li>
<ol>
<li>] athletes, musicians, moguls</li>
<li>] includes the likes of Lady Gaga,&nbsp;</li>
</ol></ol>
<li>] REVISION - ADDING some NEW CATEGORIES</li>
<ol>
<li>] curators</li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] hackers</li>
<ol>
<li>] tech-developer</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] backers</li>
<ol>
<li>] money</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] makers</li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] takers</li>
<ol>
<li>] link droppers -&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of leo laporte,&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] movers</li>
<ol>
<li>] life - productivity tips, strategies, getting the most out of every day</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] shakers</li>
<ol>
<li>] life - who makes it happen, how they did it,&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] storytellers</li>
<ol>
<li>] arts -&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] sellers</li>
<ol>
<li>] business - how to sell anything to anyone in (x) easy steps, &nbsp;Advice and strategies from the masters on the art of making the sale.</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] teachers</li>
<ol>
<li>] education -&nbsp;</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] preachers</li>
<ol>
<li>] religous - viewpoints</li>
<li>] includes the likes of&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li>] scientists</li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;</li>
</ol></ol></ol>
<h2>[WHEN]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] 2013-01-01</li>
<ol>
<li>] draft 1</li>
</ol></ol>
<h2>[EXAMPLE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] example list</li>
<ol>
<li>] draft&nbsp;</li>
</ol></ol>
<h2>[HOW-TO]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] vote for an existing nominee</li>
<li>] nominate someone</li>
<li>] add a new category</li>
</ol>
<div>
<div>
<h2>[REFERENCE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>introduction - "the A list" project</li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;<a href="/view/article?id=2116" target="_blank">overview</a>&nbsp;- a project to curate 'the best' people to follow on the g+ social network for 2014</li>
</ol>
<li>the categories</li>
<ol>
<li>] <a href="http://sospep.com/view/membergroups?id=47" target="_blank">list</a> - the complete current listing of the 'subect categories' that you can nominate people for</li>
</ol>
<li>the nominees</li>
<ol>
<li>] <a href="http://sospep.com/view/person?id=206" target="_blank">list</a> - a compiled listing of the crowdsourced nominee's from Amanda Blains original post.</li>
</ol>
<li>the selection process (this)</li>
<ol>
<li>] article - our selection process and how it makes this a better 'best-of' list</li>
</ol>
<li>the winners</li>
<ol>
<li>] # # - 50+ of the best people to follow on g+ in 2014&nbsp;</li>
</ol></ol></div>
</div>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</h1>

~ view article ~ Chapter] trends FROM [ Book] analysis-technology IN [ libraries] technology