(public).sospep.subjects ~ view article ~ android-design-document

<h1 style="text-align: center;">android 1.x - design document</h1>
<h2>[WHAT]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;<a href="http://recode.net/2014/04/13/heres-what-android-looked-like-before-the-iphone/" target="_blank">http://recode.net/2014/04/13/heres-what-android-looked-like-before-the-iphone/</a>&nbsp;- here's what android looked like before the iphone - A design document(Android Project Software Functional Requirements) from google for the android OS (circa 2006).</li>
</ol>
<h2>[WHY]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;this design document is presented in the court case - 'apple VS samsung&nbsp; - part II (software)' in 2014</li>
</ol>
<h2>[WHERE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] based on linux 2.6</li>
<li>] touchscreens would NOT be supported</li>
<li>] &ldquo;The product was designed with the presence of discrete physical buttons as an assumption. However, there is nothing fundamental in the products architecture that prevents the support of touchscreens in the future.&rdquo;</li>
<li>] Android would use Microsoft&rsquo;s FAT 32 file system &mdash; a move that would later prove problematic for device makers once Microsoft started seeking licensing fees for that and other patents.</li>
<li>] Some Android hallmarks were already present, including support for widgets and third-party applications.</li>
<li>]</li>
</ol>
<h2>[WHEN]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] presented in case against Samsung</li>
</ol>
<h2>[EXAMPLE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]</li>
</ol>
<h2>[HOW-TO]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]</li>
</ol>
<h2>[REFERENCE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] DOWNLOAD LINK <a href="http://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/217988654?extension=pdf&amp;from=embed&amp;source=embed" target="_blank">http://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/217988654?extension=pdf&amp;from=embed&amp;source=embed</a></li>
</ol>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</h1>

~ view article ~ Chapter] index FROM [ Book] analysis-software-developer IN [ libraries] technology-developer-software