(public).sospep.subjects ~ view article ~ is-Google-EVIL-part-nnn-zoe-keating-vs-youtube

<h1 style="text-align: center;">What should i do about youtube?</h1>
<h2>[WHAT]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;by Zoe Keating- musician who is having troubles coming to terms with youtube's new terms of services for it's music partners.</li>
</ol>
<h2>[WHY]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<h2>[WHERE]</h2>
<ol>
<li><strong>] READ THE FULL ARTICLE(S)</strong></li>
<ol>
<li><strong>[2015-01-22] what should i do about youtube?</strong></li>
<ol>
<li>] <a href="http://zoekeating.tumblr.com/post/108898194009/what-should-i-do-about-youtube" target="_blank">http://zoekeating.tumblr.com/post/108898194009/what-should-i-do-about-youtube</a>&nbsp;- by Zoe Keating,&nbsp; a cellist who ...</li>
<li>] <a href="http://zoekeating.tumblr.com/post/108898194009/what-should-i-do-about-youtube" target="_blank">comments on hn</a></li>
</ol>
<li><strong>[2015-01-23] nobody needs to get hurt Zoe, just sign the T&amp;Cs</strong></li>
<ol>
<li>] <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/23/youtube_google_contract_music_zoe_keating/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/23/youtube_google_contract_music_zoe_keating/</a>&nbsp;- article on the register</li>
</ol>
<li><strong>[2015-01-29</strong><strong>] </strong><a href="http://zoekeating.tumblr.com/post/109312851929/clarity" target="_blank"><strong>Clarity</strong></a><strong> - a followup post by Zoe</strong></li>
<ol>
<li>] includes transcript of conversations with Google rep</li>
<li>] <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/29/oops_google_somebody_left_a_tape_running/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/29/oops_google_somebody_left_a_tape_running/</a>&nbsp;- followup article by the register</li>
<li>] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8965388" target="_blank">comments on hn</a></li>
</ol>
<li><strong>[2015-01-dd</strong><strong>] a possible solution </strong></li>
<ol>
<li>] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8937287" target="_blank">https://<span>news.ycombinator.com/</span>item?id=8937287</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li><strong>[2015-01-dd</strong><strong>] an arguement on googles side</strong></li>
<ol>
<li>] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8966199" target="_blank">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8966199</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<li><strong>[2015-01-30</strong><strong>] and google says ...</strong></li>
<ol>
<li>] <a href="http://diffuser.fm/youtube-vs-zoe-keating/" target="_blank">http://diffuser.fm/youtube-vs-zoe-keating/</a>&nbsp;</li>
</ol></ol></ol>
<h2>[WHEN]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] 2015-01-22</li>
</ol>
<h2>[EXAMPLE]</h2>
<ol>
<li><strong>]&nbsp;the message was firm:</strong> I have to decide. I need to <strong>sign on to the new Youtube music services agreement or I will have my Youtube channel blocked.</strong></li>
<li><strong>] new music service agreement covers</strong> my Content ID account and it includes mandatory participation in Youtube&rsquo;s new subscription streaming service, called Music Key, along with all that participation entails</li>
<li><strong>] terms&nbsp;she has a problem with ...</strong></li>
<ol>
<li>] &nbsp;All of my catalog must be included in both the free and premium music service. Even if I don&rsquo;t deliver all my music, because I&rsquo;m a music partner, anything that a 3rd party uploads with my info in the description will be automatically included in the music service too</li>
<li>] All songs will be set to &ldquo;montetize&rdquo;, meaning there will be ads on them.</li>
<li>] I will be required to release new music on Youtube at the same time I release it anywhere else. So no more releasing to my core fans first on Bandcamp and then on iTunes</li>
<li>] All my catalog must be uploaded at high resolution, according to Google&rsquo;s standard which is currently 320&nbsp;kbps</li>
<li>]&nbsp;The contract lasts for 5 years.</li>
</ol>
<li><strong>] The Youtube music service was introduced to me as a win win and they don&rsquo;t understand why I don&rsquo;t see it that way.</strong> &ldquo;<em>We are trying to create a new revenue stream on top of the platform that exists today</em>.&rdquo; A lot of people in the music industry talk about Google as evil. I don&rsquo;t think they are evil. I think they, like other tech companies, are just idealistic in a way that works best for them.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>FOLLOWUP ARTICLE</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>] Several journalists have contacted me to say that <strong>a Google PR rep told them my claims were &ldquo;patently false&rdquo;</strong></li>
<li><strong>] I still haven&rsquo;t decided what to do <span style="background-color: #ffff99;">(YouTube is not at the top of my priority list right now)</span></strong> but I don&rsquo;t want to spread false information and I hope my transcript below will provide some clarity. Please, tell me what you think it means.</li>
<li>] ... transcript ...</li>
</ol>
<h2>[HOW-TO]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]</li>
</ol>
<h2>[REFERENCE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>+] calacanis.com - twist episode # - talks about googles meeting with youtubers</li>
</ol>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</h1>

~ view article ~ Chapter] ch-004-google FROM [ Book] companies IN [ libraries] business