(public).sospep.subjects ~ view article ~ ENERGY-LNG-4-more-lies-about-LNG

<h1 style="text-align: center;">4 more lies about LNG</h1>
<h2>[WHAT]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] by Andrew Niforuk @ thetyee.ca -&nbsp;The real facts behind Christy Clark's rosy claims.</li>
</ol>
<h2>[WHY]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;</li>
</ol>
<h2>[WHERE]</h2>
<ol>
<li><strong>] READ THE FULL ARTICLE</strong></li>
<ol>
<li>]&nbsp;<a href="http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2016/03/16/Whoopers-BC-LNG/?size=large" target="_blank">http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2016/03/16/Whoopers-BC-LNG/?size=large</a></li>
</ol></ol>
<h2>[WHEN]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] 2016-03-23</li>
</ol>
<h2>[EXAMPLE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] Whopper #1: Vastly less gas to sell than claimed&nbsp;</li>
<li>]&nbsp;Whopper #2: Vastly fewer LNG jobs than claimed</li>
<li>]&nbsp;Whopper #3: No, LNG prosperity is not close at hand&nbsp;</li>
<li>]&nbsp;Whopper #4: Yes, Site C dam is for powering frackers</li>
</ol>
<h2>[HOW-TO]</h2>
<ol>
<li>]</li>
</ol>
<h2>[REFERENCE]</h2>
<ol>
<li>] SRC = r/canadapolitics</li>
<li>http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Opinion+another+pipe+dream/10056095/story.html?__lsa=22b0-6f62&nbsp;</li>
<li>] Opinion: Is B.C.&rsquo;s LNG another pipe dream? Proposal looks good on paper but could fail in practice&nbsp;</li>
<li>] BY MARK JACCARD, SPECIAL TO THE VANCOUVER SUN JULY 23, 2014</li>
</ol>
<h1 style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</h1>

~ view article ~ Chapter] political-issues-provincial FROM [ Book] canada IN [ libraries] nations