article

the lesser scotts

[WHAT]

] This ia a SUMMARY of a VIDEO Q+A session at the 2015 microsoft build developer conference. Panel consisting of Scott Hanselman, Scott Hunter, Damien Edwards (ASP.net) and Rowan __ (EF guy)

[WHY]

] SUMMARY of a VIDEO

[WHERE]

] WATCH THE FULL VIDEO

] The lesser scotts

[WHEN]

] 2015-05-01

[EXAMPLE]

] what is '.net framework'?

] when you compile your app, you compile against a set of assemblies
] you then add references, call apis within those references
] previously introduced concept of reference assemblies(contracts), they represent the platform that you want to compile against, ex silverlight, windows phone,
] where ever ".net" is running
] example - when your in vs, your not running on windows phone, your compiling against a set of 'reference assemblies' that represent that platform
] .net framework has a set of reference assemblies that represent the .dot net framework on windows
] .net client profile (from ver 4 ) also had a set of those as well
] now that we have ] .net core ] .dnx ] .asp core
] > your always going to be 'compiling against' a 'promise' of 'what your going to be runinng on'
] portable class libraries
?] a common subset of reference assemblies

] the new 'asp.net' - is it new, are we starting over,

] its a brand new thing that looks a lot like the old thing, it is "concept compatible"
] there still are /controllers, /views, /routes, /actions, /razor,
] BUT IF you go deep down the stack, there is NO system.web
] EXAMPLE - of going from a 'regular car' to a 'hybrid car', the mechanics have changed, but the car still drives the same
] can bring in resources you need, open source taskrunners, javascript libraries,
] its still .net, .net on system.web(as we know it now), .net on windows phone, .net on window, its all .net
] .net represents a lot of different things ( )
] modularity

] what are the MAIN benefits of the "new" .net

] benefit = the ability to run multiple .net vers side-by-side on 1 server, with different versions of .net on server

PRB cust develops app for 1 .net ver but server has different .net ver, cust afraid to add new/diff .net vers to server b/c of existing .net ver on server, doesnt want to risk breaker

] benefits = x/platform - .net apps can now be run ON linux, windows, azure web services and mac platforms
] - app user process
] example - demo in .net deep dive presentation - published a .net app to a usb stick, choosing a random laptop from audience member, .net app works w/out touching anything on the laptop, no registry, no system 32
] .net framework - ships with windows,
] NEW .net core -
] asp.net 5 can target either .net core or .net framework
*] there are implications to your choices, .net core is 11MB, frameworks is 100MB+, it doesnt have all the same stuff
]

[07:30] what about Entity Framework 7.x ()

- concept compatible -

? asp.net or php
- web api, mvc, singleR, web pages (EX mads kristensen )
- vs OR vs code

? katana owin and asp.net 5
-

> 2 sessions 2 watch for primer

dnx - execution manager
dnv - version manager
dnu - utilites

? performance

? gulp or grunt
- runtime, bundling, minification
- default framework
- lots of choices
- user has to think about whats

? will asp.net run on iis7
- no 7.5 >

? will asp.net identity be changing
-

? more ways for developer to tap into the pipeline
- helios
-
? will migration help
be available
- guidance
- no tools for upgrade from mvc5 to mvc6

* more open, more choice ,

[HOW-TO]

] jeffry snowmer

[REFERENCE]

] VIDEO http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2015/C9-16

Details Photos Edit more