Euro Observer
Again, I understand the need to be politically correct, but let’s be clear here:
A decline of 10-20 % will revert house prices to levels from 2016 in GTA. If that is the case, then all the talks about a housing bubble prior to that year 2016 would prove to be wrong.
Down the toilet goes the credibility of this blog. The facts:
1. The bubble was noticable in 2008 (nine eyars ago). It poped in 2009 but due to Flaherty’s poilcies 0/40 it got re-inflated, this time overblown on enormous scale.
2. If we look at any meaningfull stats:
– house price appreciation for SFH in GTA s not 200 %, it is 400-500 % for the last 15-17 years, a house in Toronto pucrased for 265 k in 1999 sold for 1.6 mil in 2017.
Mississauga jumped from 200 k to 1.2 mil for SFH./ 6 times!
– significant detachment of house prices from incomes for all intends and purposes, I abolutely don’t buy it that 10-15 % increase in income justifies 400-500 % increas in house prices.
There is no way even without meaningfull normalization of interest rates (and I don’t think that it is possible, just look at Poloz’s lame excuses not to raise the rates when employment numbers are good and economy is ‘somehow ok’) to justify SFHs costing 14-15 times income before taxes!
– None of the cases that you mentioned (Japan, US) had the equivalent of the CMHC insuring mortgages and encouraging lenders to underwrite syper-risky subprime mortgages, it it also absolutely clear that there is signifcant mortgage fraud in Canada and very loos lendind standards despite what you hear in the Mass Media or lenders selft-advertisements.
There was also signifcant foreign flippers activies and (suprise, suprise) there were even no records of these so they can be taxed!
-Mindblowing incompetence in the regulating agencies, BOC and crown corporaations (CMHC), no meningfull risk model.
Nobody can convince me that a bungallow bought for 400 k at Leslie and Shepaprd is now ‘worth’ 2.8 mil and will correct to 2.5 mil which is ‘OK’
In Ireland the prices corrected by 50-70 % and our bubble is arguable much worse. Any correction south of 50 – 70 %, 75 % + in GTA is meaningless in real terms (purchasing power, not nominal price), our economy simply can not sustain the bubble in eny form or shape any more.
So when coming with suggested ’10-20 %’ decline ‘from the top consider the above, including the real crash in Ireland.
Hell, real estate in GTA could even go further up from here another 10-15, event %, it is that insane.
ID: 5641
NAME: toronto-is-in-a-housing-bubble
DESCRIPTION: [SUMMARY] toronto-is-in-a-housing-bubble - ] by Ryan Lewenza(guest blogger) @greaterfool.ca - Lewenza shares his theory on why the TO market is in a bubble, compares it to other RE market bubbles and has a strategy for a good personal outcome
AUTHOR: article.author/s
EDITOR: article.editor/s
PUBLISHER: article.publisher/s
STATUS: Write
PRIORITY: -5
OWNER ID: 75